What Moneyball Has To Teach Boards Of Directors

Primary tabs

What Moneyball Has To Teach Boards Of Directors

tweet me:
What Moneyball can teach boards of directors about increasing shareholder value http://bit.ly/rtxq7H #corpgov @AliceKorngold
Tuesday, October 4, 2011 - 10:00am

CONTENT: Blog

A group of about ten older men sitting around a meeting table were droning on uninspiringly, making their recommendations to the general manager of a baseball team. That scene of the Oakland Athletics scouts in Moneyball reminded me of too many meetings of boards of directors. Most familiar of all was the group’s reliance on the same tired old perspectives, none of which had proven successful in helping to build a championship baseball team.

There is a difference between team scouts and the board of a corporation. A board has the ultimate authority, while scouts are merely advisors. But scouts are the general manager’s brain trust; they function like an executive cabinet. Their job is to discover and sign new players from high schools, colleges and the minor leagues. As such, their role is to envision the organization’s greatest potential, and identify and assemble the right team to build a successful enterprise.

Until 2002, scouts made their recommendations based on intuition, tradition, superstition, and the good old that’s how we’ve always done it attitude.

See continuation on Fast Company here...

 

 

Korngold Consulting LLC assists corporations in building fully integrated, high-impact CSR strategies, including leadership development through nonprofit board service.  Korngold Consulting trains and places business executives on nonprofit boards, and consults to nonprofit boards and leaders to strengthen governance for financial and strategic success.
 
KORN17367

 

Keywords: Business & Trade | Bonnie Gwin | Corporate Board Member | Harvard University | Heidrick & Struggles | Michael Lewis | Moneyball | Oakland Athletics | Paul DePodesta | board governance | boards of directors

CONTENT: Blog