Water and Investing: Is Your Portfolio on the Growth Side of Disruption?

Primary tabs

Water and Investing: Is Your Portfolio on the Growth Side of Disruption?

By Lydia Miller, Senior Vice President, Dana Investment Advisors
tweet me:
Water and Investing: Is Your Portfolio on the Growth Side of Disruption? -- http://bit.ly/2pGccsx || #innovation #water #disruption #advisors #impinv #nature #cleanwater #womeninfinance #sustainability #risk #divestment #ESG #CSR #grnbz #tech #corpgov #business #eco

Multimedia from this Release

Lydia Miller, Dana Investment Advisors

Tuesday, March 27, 2018 - 7:15am

CONTENT: Blog

Water is a systemic risk to investors, as in many parts of the United States and other areas of the world this precious resource is in danger. Investors and market players should be deepening their research and investment process to tackle water risks, often hidden in holdings across all asset classes. As investors, how do we first protect our clients from these risks, and how do we position these same clients to benefit from the growth opportunities in companies that are providing innovative systems, products and services to solve water quantity, quality and resilience issues?

Several approaches seek the upside first and target water investments directly, mostly via infrastructure projects. In public equity markets, investments are often made in water utilities and industrial companies with water solutions business lines. Both of these approaches are examples of very worthy endeavors, but they are simply not enough by themselves to protect and grow the assets of most investors. Indeed some of the industrial holdings may be exposed to water risks in other parts of their businesses. Whether you are a universal owner, such as a major pension plan, a smaller institution or an individual, you are probably holding much of your assets in public equities and fixed income products. Particularly on the equity side, we’ve seen a huge move from active to passive approaches, thus the average investor is quite exposed to water risks embedded in various indexes. A recent study using SASB data highlights this exposure for the S&P 500, Russell 3000, MSCI World and EM Indexes. Using water footprinting, this study demonstrated that between 20 and 25 percent of these indexes had “high” water risk exposed industries by weight, and over 50 percent in high and medium risk categories. Divestment is not the answer, nor is targeted solution investing the entire answer in addressing water risk exposure.

We need a systemic approach to solutions and a more holistic approach to risk management and analysis. At Dana Investment Advisors, we are deploying several methodologies within our core ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) strategies to tackle this widespread challenge on behalf of our clients. This comprehensive approach includes quantitative factor modeling, fundamental analysis including assessment of innovative solutions, advocacy efforts and partnering with other like-minded entities, many of which are non-profits or universities.

Quantitative analysis involves gathering and aggregating a variety of data sources to track water exposure on a company basis and portfolio level. Greater corporate disclosure of such information is still needed, but we applaud the efforts made thus far by forward-looking corporate entities and nonprofits such as CDP that have gathered and disseminated information to investors. We utilize a variety of data providers for “raw” metrics and combine these in a proprietary ESG model. These include Trucost, ISS, MSCI, Bloomberg, Sustainalytics and more. While we have several metrics on water, we also have one that combines water and carbon intensities, as water and energy are inextricably linked. This can mean additional risks for companies setting carbon emission reduction targets that depend upon the continued availability of water. This modeling helps direct attention to those industries and specific companies that require a deeper analytic dive. We are collaborating with Peter Adriaens, Professor of Engineering, Finance and Entrepreneurship at the University of Michigan, and Director of the Center for Smart Infrastructure Finance. The objective of the project, which engages MBA students of the highly ranked Ross School of Business, is to tease out value-at-risk based stock volatility metrics that reflect water exposure risks for companies across food and beverage, semiconductor, energy and consumer products companies. 

Fundamental analysis gets to the heart of what is meant by “disruption.” Say the word “disruption” to mainstream investors and one hears about Amazon and its disruptive impact on brick and mortar retailers. To a sustainability or ESG-focused audience, disruption is often focused on renewable, clean energy coupled with storage and the negative impact or “stranding” of fossil fuel assets. Our fundamental work leads us to believe there is disruption across all sectors, as industries and companies embrace or react to technological convergences and resource constraints. Differentiating between the growth sides of disruption and avoiding or mitigating the disrupted sides is and will be a growing source of risk and return for active managers. While we’ve focused on the risk side of water, there is the solutions side that holds much promise, and has critical knowledge of innovative products and services in understanding the playing field.

Read Ms. Miller's complete Blog Post here- http://greenmoneyjournal.com/water-and-investing-is-your-portfolio-on-the-growth-side-of-disruption 

=======

Contact

Cliff Feigenbaum, founder and managing editor
GreenMoney Journal and GreenMoney.com
Keywords: Sustainable Finance & Socially Responsible Investment | Clean Water and Sanitation | Corporate Responsibility | Emissions | Energy | Environment | Green Infrastructure | GreenMoney Journal | Health & Healthcare | Innovation & Technology | Responsible Production & Consumption

CONTENT: Blog