New House Energy Committee Chair Rep. Upton Grows Skeptical About Climate Change and Waits for Business to Change his Mind
Are Michigan companies listening to climate-conscious consumers?
(3BLMedia/theCSRfeed) January 13, 2011 - In a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, new House energy committee chair Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.) continued changing his tune from being a climate solutions advocate to a climate change skeptic when he aligned himself with fellow skeptic and Americans For Prosperity (AFP) President Tim Phillips to support the lawsuits by global warming polluters against climate rules.
Upton has morphed from someone who viewed climate change as a “serious problem” in need of “serious solutions” to someone who’s not even convinced the science supporting climate change is conclusive. Moreover, Upton has thrown his support behind a lawsuit blocking the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases, specifically the EPA’s ability to issue new emissions standards for oil refineries and coal-fired power plants. Here’s a look, thanks to Brad Johnson of Grist, at Upton’s climate change stance over the past eighteen months:-
April 2009: "Climate change is a serious problem that necessitates serious solutions."
-
June 2009: "We have a unique opportunity and a responsibility to reduce emissions and preserve our economy -- the American public is desperate for solutions, but a national energy tax is not the answer."
-
December 2009: "I think we can lower our emissions. I think the world will be better off if we did that, and we can do it without cap-and-trade."
-
January 2010: "No matter what we did between now and 2050, it, there was no real science to verify that it would reduce the temperature rise that some predicted. And that's why we do need hearings."
-
December 2010: "Moreover, the principal argument for a two-year delay is that it will allow Congress time to create its own plan for regulating carbon. This presumes that carbon is a problem in need of regulation. We are not convinced."